Looking for a worthy cause?

What is ‘free’ worth to you?

Your contribution Stoller_Books_Intro_Offer.pdf to the AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) make it possible for you and thousands of other people to have access to
 free legal information and procedural help on how to file attorney misconduct
 and judicial misconduct complaints. Procedural advice that is available
 no where else. Since 1974 AEAE has advocated the “strict” enforcement
 of attorney, judicial and governmental “ethics”. AEAE is a conservative attorney
 ethics “watch dog” not for profit watch dog association located in Chicago, Illinois 60302.

They need it as much as you do — maybe more.

Information is power. Most people need procedural help when they have been
 victimized by an attorney who violated the Rules of Professional Conduct or
a Judge who may have violated the Code of Judicial Conduct. AEAE maintains
a hot line 312-545-4554 seven days a week which is open to victims of
 professional misconduct. AEAE also provides a lawyer rating service.
 You can call any time and find out if the attorney that you want to retain
 is on the AEAE “recommended” list. In addition AEAE is now establishing
a fund for victims of professional misconduct.
A person who has been
 victimized by an attorney can now make application for compensation.

This is a free service, open to all. It costs a lot of money each year to
provide our services to thousands of people every month.

AEAE needs your help, and so do they. Please give generously.

Read more about why you should give here.

Information solicited from donors is absolutely confidential..
AEAE has a
Publication offer that you cannot refuse Stoller_Books_Intro_Offer.pdf.
Check it out

• Stoller’s Blog

• Stoller’s Youtube channel

• Stoller’s digg

 

HELP AEAE ESTABLISH A FUND FOR VICTIMS OF ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT

CHICAGO–THE AMERICANS FOR THE INFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) since 1974 has been assisting parties with procedural advice on how to file attorney misconduct complaints against lawyers and judges who violate the ethical rules of conduct for 34 years.  Currently there are thousands of victims of attorney misconduct through out American, where attorneys violate the Professional Rules of Conduct by taking monies in settlements due their clients and convert those funds to their own use. AEAE is now establishing a funds to assist victims of attorney misconduct.
 In one particular sad incident a elderly woman in her 70’s made application for assistance from AEAE. She claimed that an attorney asked her to sign a power of attorney. Without the womans knowledge, the attorney obtained a mortgage on her home. When the old lady first learned of what her attorney did, from the foreclosure notice that she received informing her that her house was being forclosed upon. Prior to that the Old Lady has No Mortgage and no debt. Now the Old Lady was being thrown out of her home as a direct result of attorney misconduct. Unfortunately  AEAE, a not for profit conservative attorney advocacy group located in Chicago, Illinois was unable to assist the woman in her plight.  AEAE is now attempting to establish a fund especially for the purpose of extending financial aid to victims of professional misconduct . AEAE is seek your contributions for this worthy cause. AEAE has several very important publications which can be obtained “free” with a mimium donation of $100 or more. AEAE will of course be grateful for any contributions that you wish to make. The three publications are: Legal Manual for the Pro Se Litigant,  How to Protect your ideas by filing a Patent and How to choose a lawyer. AEAE will accept any contribution amount.  Please send your contributions to AEAE  7115 W. North Ave #272, Chicago, Illinois 60302    email Ldms4@hotmail.com   http://rentamark.blog.com/    Phone  312-545-4554  With every contribution over $100 you will receive the three eBook Publications. Please be sure to give us your email address. Thanks in advance. In another matter,  involving allegations of U.S Governmental Corruption in the  Department of Commerce,   the Comissioner of Patents and Trademarks Jon Dudas and the Director of the Office of Enrollment and Discipline ,Harry Moatz have been charged with corruption by AEAE for their failure to prosecute an attorney disciplinary complaint OED_Attorney_Fraud_Complan.pdf against Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman “respondents”. The Office of Enrollment and Discipline (OED) complaint contained prima facie and irrefutable evidence 05_29_07_-_Leo_Stoller.pdf 07_24_07_-_Leo_Stoller.pdf 08_07_07_Transcript.pdfof the respondence “fraud” on the Patent Office. By Dudas and Moatz doing “nothing” was evidence that that they were complicit. There was a story out of Washington last week that both Dudas and Moatz will be terminated. Does anyone know if Dudas and Moatz have been fired yet? Please email ldms4@hotmail.comThe Dudas and Moatz story continues:
This story continues: http://rentamark.blog.com/2681011/preview/
 http://rentamark.blog.com/2655127/preview/
http://rentamark.blog.com/2600586/preview/

• Stoller’s Blog

• Stoller’s Youtube channel

• Stoller’s digg

AEAE DOES NOT RECOMEND LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS OR ILLINOIS BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE RICHARD M. FOGEL, MICHAEL ZELLER, WILLIAM FACTOR ET AL

CHICAGO–THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY EHTICS (AEAE), a Chicago group that advocates the “strict” enforcement of attorney ethics for over 25 years. AEAE serves as the principle voice of Americans who have been “victimised” by unscrupulous attorneys and judges. An important function of the AEAE is to represent the interests of its members by serving as amicus curiate in cases addressing issues of attorney and judicial ethics. To further the interests of its members, AEAE has advocated and promoted the rigorous adherence to t he Rules of Professional Conduct http://www.iardc.org/rulesprofconduct.html and the Rules of Judicial Ethics http://www.iardc.org/rulesjudcode.html. AEAE invites parties who have had attorney disciplinary problems with lawyers to notify the appropriate disciplinary commission click http://www.abanet.org/cpr/regulation/scpd/disciplinary.html ldms4@hotmail.com AEAE maintains a list of attorneys and judges who are not recommended by AEAE. Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams, Alfred Goodman, Michael Zeller, William Factor,  http://www.roylance.com/ and Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel, Janice A. Alwin http://www.shawgusiss.com/ are names that appear on that list along with  Michael Zeller, William Factor et al.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: The fact that AEAE does not recomend an attorney does not mean that they are attorneys that are unfit to practice law, only that AEAE would not hire those lawyers. Before hiring an attorney a person should check with as many sources as possible.

Other sources may find the said attorneys as “highly” recomended. This story continues blow:

LEO STOLLER TO SUE MICHAEL T ZELLER, LANCE G. JOHNSON, WILLIAM J. BARRETT, WILLIAM FACTOR AND THEIR LAW FIRMS FOR $100 MILLION DOLLARS « Leostoller’s Weblog

LEO STOLLER TO SUE MICHAEL T ZELLER, LANCE G. JOHNSON, WILLIAM J. BARRETT, WILLIAM FACTOR AND THEIR LAW FIRMS FOR $100 MILLION DOLLARS « Leostoller’s Weblog

LEO STOLLER TO SUE MICHAEL T ZELLER, LANCE G. JOHNSON, WILLIAM J. BARRETT, WILLIAM FACTOR AND THEIR LAW FIRMS FOR $100 MILLION DOLLARS

CHICAGO—FROM LITTLE ACORNS GROW “BIG” OAK TREES. LEO STOLLER UNDER THE TERMS OF USE OF HIS BLOG HAS MADE A DEMAND FOR ARBITRATION ON MICHAEL T. ZELLER WWW.QUINNEMANUEAL.COM LANCE G. JOHNSON WWW.ROYLANCE.COM WILLIAM J. BARRETT www.bfkn.com WILLIAM J. FACTOR www.seyfarth.com et al. Despite the fact that more firms are opting to participate in alternative dispute resolution see Blue Chip Companies Are Turning Toward ADR These high priced attorneys and their law firms want to become “defendants” in Illinois State Court Litigation. Stoller intends to accommodate them. They are now all being put on public notice to advise their errors and admission insurer of the Stoller’s claim or risk losing their insurance there insurance policy defines a claim to include “knowledge by an insured of any event or circumstance which which could reasonably be expected to result in or lead to a claim being asserted against an insured.” Stoller intends to sue the above name attorneys and their law firms for $100 million dollars. Leo Stoller is the national director of Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) a Chicago based group that has advocated the “strict” enforcement of attorney ethics for over 25 years ldms4@hotmail.com By the way here is another attorney misconduct complaint filed before the Patent and Trademark Office which the Public has a right to know. A copy of the Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman http://www.roylance.com/ Office of Enrollment and Disciplinary (OED) Complaint can be down loaded by clicking this link. It will take about 4-5 minutes to load the 300 page document.pages:http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?pno=91156858&pty=OPP&eno=129

LEO STOLLER APPEALS TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT

CHICAGO–LEO STOLLER HAS FILED A WRIT OF CERT http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certiorari WITH THE U.S.SUPREME COURT, APPEALING AN ILLINOIS DECISION CASE NO 105337 DENYING HIS PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandamus. Stoller in March filed an Illinois Disciplinary Complaint with the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission www.iardc.com against two well-known divorce lawyers, a woman and male attorney from Arlington Heights, Illinois. Stoller charged them with violating ARDC Rule 3.7 Lawyer as a Witness. The ARDC Administrator Jerome Larkin declined to prosecute. Stoller moved for reconsideration. Unlike California, Florida, Michigan, Texas and most other states, Illinois does “not” permit a review and or appeal of the administrator’s decision to terminate an attorney disciplinary complaint. There are over 6000 attorney disciplinary complaints filed in the State of Illinois and less that 2% result in any disciplinary action at all. The ARDC does not want to be held accountable to the public or allow its decision to be subject to review. Stoller then filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus with the Illinois Supreme Court, which is part of the ARDC. On No. 6, 2007 the Illinois Supreme Court denied Stoller request for a Mandamus action to order the ARDC to reopen its investigation into these two famous Divorce lawyers. Stoller filed his Writ of Certiorari before the highest court in the land and presented the following questions:
1.  Whether the Illinois Supreme Court rules denying a grievant’s right to appeal an Administrator’s decision to conclude an investigation of an attorney disciplinary matter conflicts with the rules of the Supreme Courts of California, Florida, Oklahoma, Michigan and Texas, which all permit a grievant the right to appeal?
2   Whether Illinois Supreme Court rule 766(a)(1) Investigations conducted by the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission are Private and Confidential violates the First Amendment of the U.S. constitution and the public’s right to know?
3. Whether there is a constitutional right for a grievant to appeal an Administrator’s decision to conclude an investigation of an attorney?
Leo Stoller is the national director of Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) a Chicago based group that has advocated the “strict” enforcement of attorney ethics for over 25 years ldms4@hotmail.com  

Judge Schmetterer dismissed Civil Contempt Charges

Chicago–Judge Jack Schmetterer dismissed civil contempt charges against Stoller for exercising his right to take the 5th amendment.  Judge Schmetterer said that the contempt was “purged”. Stoller ldms4@hotmail.com is the Executive Director of Americans for the Enforcement of Judicial Ethics (AEJE). A Chicago based judicial ethics watch dog group.  The Story continues at http://rentamark.blog.com

GOOGLE INC CHARGED WITH INFRINGEMENT WILL PAY MILLIONS ACCORDING TO EXPERT

CHICAGO–NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY AND JARG CORP SUED GOOGLE INC., FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT of “search technology” patented in 1997, prior to the incorporation of Google Inc. The suit was filed in the Eastern District of Texas where courts have in the past favored plaintiffs in patent cases. In the opinion of at least one expert Google Inc., may guilty of patent infringement and liable for millions. The outcome will depend on the experts hired by both sides.

The suit alleges that Google has never obtained a legal opinion on whether the company infringes on the ‘593 patent. It seeks a jury trial and an injunction against further infringement of the search patent, damages, royalty payments.

The case centers on U.S. patent No. 5,694,593, entitled “Distributed Computer Database System and Method,” which was inventedby Dr. Kenneth Baclawski, an associate professor in Northeastern’s computer science department.

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!